Another comment from rejected wannabe police chief, Glenn D. Frankovis. Yes, he would have been a fine police chief for the wingnut/bigoted citizens of Milwaukee (sarcasm intended).
Owen, it’s all about “Diversity uber alles” and the liberal racist feeling good about him/herself for helping the poor “oppressed” minority (or other protected class member) because it’s very apparent (to the lib) that without the lib’s help, this person couldn’t do it by him/herself. Equal Opportunity just isn’t enough for these people.
What a pathetic statement. His proof is some obsure comment by Hubert Humphrey back in 1964. Fact is Humphrey was a hack. He was willing to say anything to ensure a chance at the Presidency (kind of like Liberman today). To use him as an example of liberal policies is, to say the least, bizarre.
Frankovis, you are a twisted putz and the city of Milwaukee is light years better off that you are not being considered for police chief.
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Frankovis for Dogcatcher
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 Swings of the bat:
HH may have been ambitious, but he was an honorable guy--in the same fashion as is Feingold.
(Surprise!!--never thought you'd see that from me, eh?)
Of course, I disagreed with almost every program HH proposed, (as I do with Feingold.) But that doesn't mean that they are insincere.
They're just wrong, that's all.
It doesn't surprise me at all. You've always come across as honorable to me, if not wrong. :)
However, Humphrey was a consummate politician, which means he was good at doubletalk. Feingold is straightforward, Humphrey was not.
Could you imagine me speaking ill of a Democrat?
Post a Comment